OCDE, Entrées d’immigrés permanents, OECD.Stat, Paris
Documents
Institut de droit international, Règles internationales sur l’admission et l’expulsion des étrangers, 1892.
Zimbabwe Supreme Court, 13 June 1994, Rattigan and Others v. Chief Immigration Officer of Zimbabwe, Cases No 45/94; 92/94 1995 (2) SA 182 (ZS) [Whether a female citizen of Zimbabwe married to a man who is an alien, being citizen of a foreign country, is entitled to the right to reside permanently with her husband in Zimbabwe]
South Africa, Constitutional Court, 7 June 2000, Dawood and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others; Shalabi and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others; Thomas and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (CCT35/99) [2000] ZACC 8; 2000 (3) SA 936; 2000 (8) BCLR 837, § 23: “Section 27 of the Act imposes an obligation, on pain of criminal sanction, upon foreigners who do not possess either an immigration permit or a temporary residence permit to present themselves to the Department. Furthermore, it is clear from section 26(7) that people who continue to reside in South Africa once their temporary residence permits have expired are guilty of a criminal offence. The responsibility for ensuring compliance with the provisions of the Act is therefore placed squarely on the shoulders of those wishing to obtain permits to reside in South Africa. Evading or ignoring those responsibilities constitutes criminal conduct and may result in deportation ».
Doctrine
Akandji-Kombé J.-F., « Quel droit au séjour et droits de séjour pour le migrant en situation irrégulière ? Eléments de droit européen », in Humanisme et droit. En hommage au professeur Jean Dhommeaux, Paris, Pedone, 2013, pp. 137 ss.
Aubin E., « La Convention de Schengen devant le Conseil d’Etat . – Le contrôle juridictionnel des refus de visas », La Semaine Juridique Edition Générale n° 7, 13 Février 2002
Battjes H., « In Search of a Fair Balance: The Absolute Character of the Prohibition of Refoulement under Article 3 ECHR Reassessed », Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, 2009, pp 583-621.
Battjes H., « The Soering Threshold: Why Only Fundamental Values prohibit Refoulement in ECHR Case Law », European Journal of Migration Law 11 (2009), pp. 205-219.
Bourgon S., “The Impact of Terrorism on the Principle of ‘Non-Refoulement’ of Refugees: the Suresh Case before the Supreme Court of Canada”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 169-185
Chan Phil C. W., “The Protection of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons: Non-Refoulement under Customary International Law?”, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2006, pp. 231-239.
Chassin C.-A., « Entrée et éloignement des étrangers. Expulsion et violation virtuelle de la Convention (arrêt Sultani du 20 septembre 2007) », in La France et la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. 1998-2008 : Une décennie d’application du protocole XI. La jurisprudence en 2007, P. Tavernier (dir.), Cahiers du CREDHO n° 14/2008, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2009, pp. 245-262.
Chetail V., « Le principe de non-refoulement et le statut de réfugié en droit international », in Chetail V., Flauss J.-F. (dir.), La Convention de Genève du 28 juillet 1951 relative au statut de réfugié – 50 ans après : bilan et perspectives, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2001, pp. 3 ss.
Coleman N., “Non-Refoulement Revised: Renewed Review of the Status of the Principle of Non-Refoulement as Customary International Law”, E.J.M.L., vol. 5, No. 1, 2003, pp. 23-68.
d’Haëm R., « Violation de l’article 8 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme et refus de titre de séjour. Moyen opérant ou inopérant », AJDA, 2011, pp. 542 ss.
Delas O., Principe de non refoulement dans la jurisprudence internationale des droits de l’homme ; de la consécration à la contestation, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2011
di Pascale A., “Exceptional Duties to Admit Aliens”, in Plender R. (ed.), Issues in International Migration Law, Leiden, Boston, Brill, Nijhoff, 2015, pp. 201 ss.
Doehring (K.), « Aliens admission », in bernhardt R. (dir), Encyclopedia of public international law, Max Plancke institute Heidelberg, vol I, 1992, pp. 109 ss.
Dumas P., L’accès des ressortissants des pays tiers aux territoires des Etats membres de l’Union européenne, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2013, 938 p.
Frelick B., “Abundantly Clear: Refoulement “, Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2004-2005, pp. 245–275.
Goodwin-Gill G. S., “Non-refoulement and the New Asylum Seekers”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, 1985-1986, pp. 897-918.
Lochak D., « Droits et libertés des étrangers. –Droit au séjour », Jurisclasseur droit international, fasc. 524-55, 2011
Martin S.-M., “Non-refoulement of refugees: United States compliance with international obligations [prohibiting expulsion of refugees to territories where persecution would result]”, Harvard International Law Journal, 1983, p. 357-380.
Nafziger J. A. R., “The general admission of aliens under international law”, AJIL, 1983, No. 4, pp. 804-847.
Okafor O. C., P. L. Okoronkwo, “Re-configuring Non-refoulement? The Suresh Decision, ‘Security Relativism”, and the international Human Rights imperative”, International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 15, no 1, 2003, pp. 30-67.
Pizor, Andrew G., « Sale v. Haitian Centers Council : The Return of Haitian Refugees », Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 17, Issue 4, 1993, pp. 1062-1114.
Stenberg G., Non-expulsion and Non-refoulement: the Prohibition against Removal of Refugees with Special References to Articles 32 and 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Uppsala, Iustus Förlag, 1989, 309 p.
Trauner F., Kruse I., “EC Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements: A New Standard EU Foreign Policy Tool “, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 10, 2008, pp. 411-438.